Basic Principles of Hemodynamics in Pacing

References

1. • Lassers B.W.
   • Anderton J.L.
   • George M.
   • et al.
   Hemodynamic effects of artificial pacing in complete heart block complicating acute myocardial infarction.
   Circulation. 1968; 38: 308-323https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.38.2.308
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Sowton E.
   Hemodynamic studies in patients with artificial pacemakers.
   Br Heart J. 1964; 26: 737-746https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.26.6.737
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Buckingham T.A.
   • Janosik D.L.
   • Pearson A.C.
   Pacemaker hemodynamics: clinical implications.
   Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1992; 34: 347-366https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-0620(92)90039-3
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Reiter M.J.
   • Hindman M.C.
   Hemodynamic effects of acute atrioventricular sequential pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
   Am J Cardiol. 1982; 49: 687-692https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(82)91947-6
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Hartzler G.O.
   • Maloney J.D.
   • Curtis J.J.
   • et al.
   Hemodynamic benefits of atrioventricular sequential pacing after cardiac surgery.
   Am J Cardiol. 1977; 40: 232-236https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(77)90013-3
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Cazeau S.
   • Ritter P.
   • Bakdach S.
   • et al.
   Four chamber pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy.
   Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994; 17: 1974-1979https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb03783.x
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Auricchio A.
   • Stellbrink C.
   • Sack S.
   • et al.
   • Pacing Therapies in Congestive Heart Failure (PATH-CHF) Study Group
   Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 2026-2033https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01895-8
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Cleland J.G.
   • Daubert J.C.
   • Erdmann E.
   • et al.
   The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure.
   N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1539-1549https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa050496
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Arnold A.D.
   • Shun-Shin M.J.
   • Keene D.
   • et al.
   His resynchronization versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 3112-3122https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.073
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Houston B.A.
    • Sturdivant J.L.
    • Yu Y.
    • et al.
    Acute biventricular hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block.
    Heart Rhythm. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.017
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Thibault B.
    • Dubuc M.
    • Khairy P.
    • et al.
    Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead.
    Europace. 2013; 15: 984-991https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus435
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Sterliński M.
    • Sokal A.
    • Lenarczyk R.
    • et al.
    In heart failure patients with left bundle branch block single lead MultiSpot left ventricular pacing does not improve acute hemodynamic response to conventional biventricular pacing. A multicenter prospective, interventional, non-randomized study.
    PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0154024https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154024
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Manisty C.H.
    • Al-Hussaini A.
    • Unsworth B.
    • et al.
    The acute effects of changes to AV delay on BP and stroke volume: potential implications for design of pacemaker optimization protocols.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5: 122-130https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.111.964205
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Kyriacou A.
    • Pabari P.A.
    • Whinnett Z.I.
    • et al.
    Fully automatable, reproducible, noninvasive simple plethysmographic optimization: proof of concept and potential for implantability.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012; 35: 948-960https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03435.x
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Pabari P.A.
    • Willson K.
    • Stegemann B.
    • et al.
    When is an optimization not an optimization? Evaluation of clinical implications of information content (signal-to-noise ratio) in optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy, and how to measure and maximize it.
    Heart Fail Rev. 2011; 16: 277-290https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-010-9203-5
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Stegemann B.
    • Francis D.P.
    Atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization and response quantification in biventricular pacing: arrival of reliable clinical algorithms and research protocols, and how to distinguish them from unreliable counterparts.
    Europace. 2012; 14: 1679-1683https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus242
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Whinnett Z.I.
    • Francis D.P.
    • Denis A.
    • et al.
    Comparison of different invasive hemodynamic methods for AV delay optimization in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: implications for clinical trial design and clinical practice.
    Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168: 2228-2237https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.216
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Whinnett Z.I.
    • Davies J.E.
    • Willson K.
    • et al.
    Determination of optimal atrioventricular delay for cardiac resynchronization therapy using acute non-invasive blood pressure.
    Europace. 2006; 8: 358-366https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eul017
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Whinnett Z.I.
    • Nott G.
    • Davies J.E.
    • et al.
    Maximizing efficiency of alternation algorithms for hemodynamic optimization of the AV delay of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011; 34: 217-225https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02933.x
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Shun-Shin M.J.
    • Miyazawa A.A.
    • Keene D.
    • et al.
    How to deliver personalized cardiac resynchronization therapy through the precise measurement of the acute hemodynamic response: insights from the iSpot trial.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019; 30: 1610-1619https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14001
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Francis D.P.
    How to reliably deliver narrow individual-patient error bars for optimization of pacemaker AV or VV delay using a “pick-the-highest” strategy with hemodynamic measurements.
    Int J Cardiol. 2013; 163: 221-225https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.03.128
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Whinnett Z.I.
    • Davies J.E.
    • Willson K.
    • et al.
    Hemodynamic effects of changes in atrioventricular and interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronisation therapy show a consistent pattern: analysis of shape, magnitude and relative importance of atrioventricular and interventricular delay.
    Heart. 2006; 92: 1628-1634https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.080721
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Porciani M.C.
    • Dondina C.
    • Macioce R.
    • et al.
    Echocardiographic examination of atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95: 1108-1110https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.028
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Stockburger M.
    • Fateh-Moghadam S.
    • Nitardy A.
    • et al.
    Optimization of cardiac resynchronization guided by Doppler echocardiography: hemodynamic improvement and intraindividual variability with different pacing configurations and atrioventricular delays.
    Europace. 2006; 8: 881-886https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eul088
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Thomas D.E.
    • Yousef Z.R.
    • Fraser A.G.
    A critical comparison of echocardiographic measurements used for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy: stroke distance is best.
    Eur J Heart Fail. 2009; 11: 779-788https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfp086
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Gold M.R.
    • Niazi I.
    • Giudici M.
    • et al.
    A prospective comparison of AV delay programming methods for hemodynamic optimization during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18: 490-496https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00770.x
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Vanderheyden M.
    • De Backer T.
    • Rivero-Ayerza M.
    • et al.
    Tailored echocardiographic interventricular delay programming further optimizes left ventricular performance after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2: 1066-1072https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.07.016
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Cardiocases
    Sorin algorithm. In: Cardiocases.
    (Available at:)
    https://www.cardiocases.com/en/pacingdefibrillation/specificities/crt-av-vv-delays-optimization/livanova/sorin-algorithm
    (October 3, 2021)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Delnoy P.P.
    • Ritter P.
    • Naegele H.
    • et al.
    Association between frequent cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization and long-term clinical response: a post hoc analysis of the Clinical Evaluation on Advanced Resynchronization (CLEAR) pilot study.
    Europace. 2013; 15: 1174-1181https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut034
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Ruschitzka F.
    • Abraham W.T.
    • Singh J.P.
    • et al.
    Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with a narrow QRS complex.
    N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1395-1405https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1306687
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Keene D.
    • Shun-Shin M.J.
    • Arnold A.D.
    • et al.
    Quantification of electromechanical coupling to prevent inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019; 5: 705-715https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2019.01.025
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar