Pacing Optimized by Left Ventricular dP/dt_max

References

1. • Sieniewicz B.J.
   • Gould J.
   • Porter B.
   • et al.
   Understanding non-response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy: common problems and potential solutions.
   Heart Fail Rev. 2019; 24: 41-54
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Duckett S.G.
   • Ginks M.
   • Shetty A.K.
   • et al.
   Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 1128-1136
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Sohal M.
   • Hamid S.
   • Perego G.
   • et al.
   A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by invasive dP/dt.
   Heart Rhythm O2. 2021; 2: 19-27
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Niederer S.
   • Walker C.
   • Crozier A.
   • et al.
   The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
   Clin Trials Regul Sci Cardiol. 2015; 12: 18-22
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Whinnett Z.I.
   • Francis D.P.
   • Denis A.
   • et al.
   Comparison of different invasive hemodynamic methods for AV delay optimization in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: implications for clinical trial design and clinical practice.
   Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168: 2228-2237
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • van Gelder B.M.
   • Meijer A.
   • Bracke F.A.
   Stimulation rate and the optimal interventricular interval during cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.
   Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008; 31: 569-574
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Thibault B.
   • Dubuc M.
   • Karst E.
   • et al.
   Design of an acute dP/dt hemodynamic measurement protocol to isolate cardiac effect of pacing.
   J Card Fail. 2014; 20: 365-372
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Pabari P.A.
   • Willson K.
   • Stegemann B.
   • et al.
   When is an optimization not an optimization? Evaluation of clinical implications of information content (signal-to-noise ratio) in optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy, and how to measure and maximize it.
   Heart Fail Rev. 2011; 16: 277-290
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Tissot C.
   • Singh Y.
   • Sekarski N.
   Echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular function-for the neonatologist and pediatric intensivist.
   Front Pediatr. 2018; 6: 1-12
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Bargiggia G.S.
    • Bertucci C.
    • Recusani F.
    • et al.
    A new method for estimating left ventricular dP/dt by continuous wave Doppler-echocardiography. Validation studies at cardiac catheterization.
    Circulation. 1989; 80: 1287-1292
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Oguz E.
    • Dagdeviren B.
    • Bilsel T.
    • et al.
    Echocardiographic prediction of long-term response to biventricular pacemaker in severe heart failure.
    Eur J Heart Fail. 2002; 4: 83-90
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • de Roest G.J.
    • Allaart C.P.
    • Kleijn S.A.
    • et al.
    Prediction of long-term outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy by acute pressure-volume loop measurements.
    Eur J Heart Fail. 2013; 15: 299-307
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Donahue T.
    • Niazi I.
    • Leon A.
    • et al.
    Acute and chronic response to CRT in narrow QRS patients.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2012; 5 (In this issue): 232-241https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-011-9338-3
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Niazi I.
    • Kiemen J.O.A.N.N.
    • Yong P.
    • et al.
    Hemodynamic superiority of dual-site left ventricular stimulation over conventional biventricular stimulation in heart failure patients.
    The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management. 2011; 2: 412-418
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Gold M.R.
    • Niazi I.
    • Giudici M.
    • et al.
    A prospective comparison of AV delay programming methods for hemodynamic optimization during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18: 490-496
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Ruschitzka F.
    • Abraham W.T.
    • Singh J.P.
    • et al.
    Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with narrow QRS complexes.
    N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1395-1405
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Tournoux F.B.
    • Alabiad C.
    • Fan D.
    • et al.
    Echocardiographic measures of acute haemodynamic response after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict long-term clinical outcome.
    Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 1143-1148
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Suzuki H.
    • Shimano M.
    • Yoshida Y.
    • et al.
    Maximum derivative of left ventricular pressure predicts cardiac mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Clin Cardiol. 2010; 33https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20683
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Bogaard M.D.
    • Houthuizen P.
    • Bracke F.A.
    • et al.
    Baseline left ventricular dP/dt max rather than the acute improvement in dP/dt max predicts clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Eur J Heart Fail. 2011; 13: 1126-1132
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Butter C.
    • Auricchio A.
    • Stellbrink C.
    • et al.
    Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients.
    Circulation. 2001; 104: 3026-3029
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Gold M.R.
    • Auricchio A.
    • Hummel J.D.
    • et al.
    Comparison of stimulation sites within left ventricular veins on the acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2: 376-381
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • de Roest G.J.
    • Allaart C.P.
    • de Haan S.
    • et al.
    Effects of QRS duration and pacing location on pressure-volume loop evaluation of cardiac resynchronization therapy in end-stage heart failure.
    Am J Cardiol. 2011; 108: 1581-1588
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Stockinger J.
    • Staier K.
    • Schiebeling-RÖmer J.
    • et al.
    Acute hemodynamic effects of right and left ventricular lead positions during the implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011; 34: 1537-1543
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Zanon F.
    • Baracca E.
    • Pastore G.
    • et al.
    Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
    Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12: 975-981
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Kass D.A.
    • Chen C.H.
    • Curry C.
    • et al.
    Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay.
    Circulation. 1999; 99: 1567-1573
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Auricchio A.
    • Stellbrink C.
    • Block M.
    • et al.
    Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure.
    Circulation. 1999; 99: 2993-3001
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • van Gelder B.M.
    • Bracke F.A.
    • van der Voort P.H.
    • et al.
    Optimal sensed atrio-ventricular interval determined by paced QRS morphology.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007; 30: 476-481
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Kurzidim K.
    • Reinke H.
    • Sperzel J.
    • et al.
    Invasive optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: role of sequential biventricular and left ventricular pacing.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005; 28: 754-761
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • van Gelder B.M.
    • Meijer A.
    • Bracke F.A.
    The optimized V-V interval determined by interventricular conduction times versus invasive measurement by LVdP/dtMAX.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19: 939-944
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Jansen A.H.M.
    • Bracke F.A.
    • van Dantzig J.M.
    • et al.
    Correlation of echo-Doppler optimization of atrioventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy with invasive hemodynamics in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
    Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 552-557
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Morales M.A.
    • Startari U.
    • Panchetti L.
    • et al.
    Atrioventricular delay optimization by Doppler-derived left ventricular dP/dt improves 6-month outcome of resynchronized patients.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006; 29: 564-568
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Ellenbogen K.A.
    • Gold M.R.
    • Meyer T.E.
    • et al.
    Primary results from the SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison to other AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV) trial: a randomized trial comparing empirical, echocardiography- guided, and algorithmic atrioventricular delay programming in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Circulation. 2010; 122: 2660-2668
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Starling R.C.
    • Krum H.
    • Bril S.
    • et al.
    Impact of a novel adaptive optimization algorithm on 30-day readmissions. Evidence from the adaptive CRT trial.
    JACC Heart Fail. 2015; 3: 565-572
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Varma N.
    • Hu Y.
    • Connolly A.T.
    • et al.
    Gain in real-world cardiac resynchronization therapy efficacy with SyncAV dynamic optimization: heart failure hospitalizations and costs.
    Heart Rhythm. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.05.006
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Rinaldi C.A.
    • Burri H.
    • Thibault B.
    • et al.
    A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Europace. 2014; 17: 7-17
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Thibault B.
    • Dubuc M.
    • Khairy P.
    • et al.
    Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead.
    Europace. 2013; 15: 984-991
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Pappone C.
    • Ćalović Ž.
    • Vicedomini G.
    • et al.
    Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.
    Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11: 394-401
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Umar F.
    • Taylor R.J.
    • Stegemann B.
    • et al.
    Haemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-vein, three-pole, multipoint left ventricular pacing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular free wall scar: the MAESTRO study.
    Europace. 2016; 18: 1227-1234
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Zanon F.
    • Marcantoni L.
    • Baracca E.
    • et al.
    Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year.
    Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13: 1644-1651
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Mehta V.S.
    • Elliott M.K.
    • Sidhu B.S.
    • et al.
    Multipoint pacing for cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021; 32: 2577-2589
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • Rogers D.P.S.
    • Lambiase P.D.
    • Lowe M.D.
    • et al.
    A randomized double-blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure.
    Eur J Heart Fail. 2012; 14: 495-505
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Leclercq C.
    • Gadler F.
    • Kranig W.
    • et al.
    A randomized comparison of triple-site versus dual-site ventricular stimulation in patients with congestive heart failure.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: 1455-1462
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Bordachar P.
    • Gras D.
    • Clementy N.
    • et al.
    Clinical impact of an additional left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy nonresponders: the V3 trial.
    Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15: 870-876
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Gould J.
    • Claridge S.
    • Jackson T.
    • et al.
    Standard care versus TRIVEntricular pacing in Heart Failure (STRIVE HF): a prospective multicenter randomized control trial of triventricular pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intermediate QRS LBBB.
    Europace. 2021; (Accepted (In press))
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Sohal M.
    • Shetty A.
    • Niederer S.
    • et al.
    Mechanistic insights into the benefits of multisite pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: the importance of electrical substrate and rate of left ventricular activation.
    Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12: 2449-2457
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • Jackson T.
    • Lenarczyk R.
    • Sterlinski M.
    • et al.
    Left ventricular scar and the acute hemodynamic effects of multivein and multipolar pacing in cardiac resynchronization.
    IJC Heart and Vasculature. 2018; 19: 14-19
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Ploux S.
    • Strik M.
    • van Hunnik A.
    • et al.
    Acute electrical and hemodynamic effects of multisite left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in the dyssynchronous canine heart.
    Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11: 119-125
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Heckman L.I.B.
    • Kuiper M.
    • Anselme F.
    • et al.
    Evaluating multisite pacing strategies in cardiac resynchronization therapy in the preclinical setting.
    Heart Rhythm O2. 2020; 1: 111-119
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Sieniewicz B.J.
    • Betts T.R.
    • James S.
    • et al.
    Real-world experience of leadless left ventricular endocardial cardiac resynchronization therapy: a multicenter international registry of the WiSE-CRT pacing system.
    Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17: 1291-1297
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • Spragg D.D.
    • Dong J.
    • Fetics B.J.
    • et al.
    Optimal left ventricular endocardial pacing sites for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 774-781
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
51. • Derval N.
    • Steendijk P.
    • Gula L.J.
    • et al.
    Optimizing hemodynamics in heart failure patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites. the lateral left ventricular wall and the coronary sinus are rarely the best sites.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 566-575
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
52. • Padeletti L.
    • Pieragnoli P.
    • Ricciardi G.
    • et al.
    Acute hemodynamic effect of left ventricular endocardial pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: assessment by pressure-volume loops.
    Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2012; 5: 460-467
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
53. • Shetty A.K.
    • Sohal M.
    • Chen Z.
    • et al.
    A comparison of left ventricular endocardial, multisite, and multipolar epicardial cardiac resynchronization: an acute haemodynamic and electroanatomical study.
    Europace. 2014; 16: 873-879
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
54. • Behar J.M.
    • Jackson T.
    • Hyde E.
    • et al.
    Optimized left ventricular endocardial stimulation is superior to optimized epicardial stimulation in ischemic patients with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a combined magnetic resonance imaging, electroanatomic contact mapping, and hemodynamic study to target endocardial lead placement.
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016; 2: 799-809
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
55. • Hyde E.R.
    • Behar J.M.
    • Claridge S.
    • et al.
    Beneficial effect on cardiac resynchronization from left ventricular endocardial pacing is mediated by early access to high conduction velocity tissue: electrophysiological simulation study.
    Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2015; 8: 1164-1172
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
56. • Sieniewicz B.J.
    • Behar J.M.
    • Gould J.
    • et al.
    Guidance for optimal site selection of a leadless left ventricular endocardial electrode improves acute hemodynamic response and chronic remodeling.
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4: 860-868
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
57. • Elliott M.
    • Jacon P.
    • Sidhu B.S.
    • et al.
    Technical feasibility of leadless left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronisation: a case series.
    Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021; 5 (Accepted (In press)): ytab379
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
58. • Arnold A.D.
    • Shun-Shin M.J.
    • Keene D.
    • et al.
    His resynchronization versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 3112-3122
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
59. • Salden F.C.W.M.
    • Luermans J.G.L.M.
    • Westra S.W.
    • et al.
    Short-term hemodynamic and electrophysiological effects of cardiac resynchronization by left ventricular septal pacing.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75: 347-359
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
60. • Upadhyay G.A.
    • Cherian T.
    • Shatz D.Y.
    • et al.
    Intracardiac delineation of septal conduction in left bundle-branch block patterns.
    Circulation. 2019; 139: 1876-1888
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
61. • Elliott M.K.
    • Mehta V.
    • Sidhu B.S.
    • et al.
    Electrocardiographic imaging of His bundle, left bundle branch, epicardial, and endocardial left ventricular pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020; 6: 460-463
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
62. • Elliott M.
    • Strocchi M.
    • Sidhu B.
    • et al.
    Acute hemodynamic response of epicardial and endocardial cardiac resynchronization therapy, His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing.
    EP Europace. 2021; 23: 2021
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar