Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing

References

1. • Vernooy K.
   • van Deursen C.J.M.
   • Strik M.
   • et al.
   Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.
   Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014; 11: 481-493
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Strik M.
   • Rademakers L.M.
   • van Deursen C.J.M.
   • et al.
   Endocardial left ventricular pacing improves cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic asynchronous infarction and heart failure models.
   Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5: 191-200
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Derval N.
   • Steendijk P.
   • Gula L.J.
   • et al.
   Optimizing hemodynamics in heart failure patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites: the lateral left ventricular wall and the coronary sinus are rarely the best sites.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 566-575
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Spragg D.D.
   • Dong J.
   • Fetics B.J.
   • et al.
   Optimal left ventricular endocardial pacing sites for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 774-781
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Bordachar P.
   • Derval N.
   • Ploux S.
   • et al.
   Left ventricular endocardial stimulation for severe heart failure.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 747-753
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Deif B.
   • Ballantyne B.
   • Almehmadi F.
   • et al.
   Cardiac resynchronization is pro-arrhythmic in the absence of reverse ventricular remodelling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
   Cardiovasc Res. 2018; 114: 1435-1444
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Yamin M.
   • Yuniadi Y.
   • Alwi I.
   • et al.
   Endocardial biventricular pacing for chronic heart failure patients: effect on transmural dispersion of repolarization.
   J Arrhythmia. 2019; 35: 664-669
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Behar J.M.
   • Jackson T.
   • Hyde E.
   • et al.
   Optimized left ventricular endocardial stimulation is superior to optimized epicardial stimulation in ischemic patients with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
   Jacc Clin Electrophysiol. 2016; 2: 799-809
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Pabari P.A.
   • Willson K.
   • Stegemann B.
   • et al.
   When is an optimization not an optimization? Evaluation of clinical implications of information content (signal-to-noise ratio) in optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy, and how to measure and maximize it.
   Heart Fail Rev. 2011; 16: 277-290
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Prinzen F.W.
    • Houthuizen P.
    • Bogaard M.D.
    • et al.
    Is acute hemodynamic response a predictor of long-term outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy?.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 1198
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Reinig M.
    • White M.
    • Levine M.
    • et al.
    Left ventricular endocardial pacing: a transarterial approach.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2007; 30: 1464-1468
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Reising S.
    • Safford R.
    • Castello R.
    • et al.
    A stroke of bad luck: left ventricular pacemaker malposition.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007; 20: 1316.e1-1316.e3
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Kassai I.
    • Foldesi C.
    • Szekely A.
    • et al.
    New method for cardiac resynchronization therapy: transapical endocardial lead implantation for left ventricular free wall pacing.
    Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2008; 10: 882-883
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Gamble J.H.P.
    • Herring N.
    • Ginks M.R.
    • et al.
    Endocardial left ventricular pacing across the interventricular septum for cardiac resynchronization therapy: clinical results of a pilot study.
    Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15: 1017-1022
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Betts T.R.
    • Gamble J.H.P.
    • Khiani R.
    • et al.
    Development of a technique for left ventricular endocardial pacing via puncture of the interventricular septum.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7: 17-22
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Morgan J.M.
    • Scott P.A.
    • Turner N.G.
    • et al.
    Targeted left ventricular endocardial pacing using a steerable introducing guide catheter and active fixation pacing lead.
    EP Eur. 2009; 11: 502-506
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Morgan J.M.
    • Biffi M.
    • Gellér L.
    • et al.
    ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC): a prospective and multicentre study of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 2118-2127
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Gamble J.H.P.
    • Herring N.
    • Ginks M.
    • et al.
    Endocardial left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2018; 20: 73-81
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Reddy V.Y.
    • Miller M.A.
    • Neuzil P.
    • et al.
    Cardiac resynchronization therapy with wireless left ventricular endocardial pacing: the SELECT-LV study.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69: 2119-2129
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Sieniewicz B.J.
    • Betts T.R.
    • James S.
    • et al.
    Real-world experience of leadless left ventricular endocardial cardiac resynchronization therapy: a multicenter international registry of the WiSE-CRT pacing system.
    Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17: 1291-1297
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Okabe T.
    • Hummel J.D.
    • Bank A.J.
    • et al.
    Leadless left ventricular stimulation with WiSE-CRT System - initial experience and results from phase I of SOLVE-CRT Study (nonrandomized, roll-in phase).
    Heart Rhythm. 2021; (S1547-5271(21)01808-7)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.06.1195
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Bologne J.C.
    • Garweg C.
    • Lancellotti P.
    • et al.
    [Inadvertent implantation of a defibrillation lead in the left ventricle through a patent foramen ovale].
    Rev Med Liege. 2012; 67: 58-60
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Webb G.
    • Gatzoulis M.A.
    Atrial septal defects in the adult.
    Circulation. 2006; 114: 1645-1653
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Singh J.P.
    • Walsh M.N.
    • Kubo S.H.
    • et al.
    Modified design of stimulation of the left ventricular endocardium for cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonresponders, previously untreatable and high-risk upgrade patients (SOLVE-CRT) trial.
    Am Heart J. 2021; 235: 158-162
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Zhang J.
    • Sheng X.
    • Pan Y.
    • et al.
    Electrophysiological insights into three modalities of left bundle branch area pacing in patients indicated for pacing therapy.
    Int Heart J. 2021; 62: 78-86
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Heckman L.I.B.
    • Luermans J.G.L.M.
    • Curila K.
    • et al.
    Comparing ventricular synchrony in left bundle branch and left ventricular septal pacing in pacemaker patients.
    J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 822
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Salden F.C.W.M.
    • Luermans J.G.L.M.
    • Westra S.W.
    • et al.
    Short-term hemodynamic and electrophysiological effects of cardiac resynchronization by left ventricular septal pacing.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75: 347-359
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Mills R.W.
    • Cornelussen R.N.
    • Mulligan L.J.
    • et al.
    Left ventricular septal and left ventricular apical pacing chronically maintain cardiac contractile coordination, pump function and efficiency.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2: 571-579
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Strik M.
    • van Deursen C.J.M.
    • van Middendorp L.B.
    • et al.
    Transseptal conduction as an important determinant for cardiac resynchronization therapy, as revealed by extensive electrical mapping in the dyssynchronous canine heart.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6: 682-689
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Strik M.
    • Ploux S.
    • Huntjens P.R.
    • et al.
    Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is determined by intrinsic electrical substrate rather than by its modification.
    Int J Cardiol. 2018; 270: 143-148
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Carabelli A.
    • Jabeur M.
    • Jacon P.
    • et al.
    European experience with a first totally leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker system.
    Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2021; 23: 740-747
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar