What Body Surface Mapping Has Taught Us About Ventricular Conduction Disease Implications for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and His Bundle Pacing

References

1. • Vernooy K.
   • van Deursen C.J.M.
   • Strik M.
   • Prinzen F.W.
   Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.
   Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014; 11: 481-493
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Strik M.
   • Ploux S.
   • Vernooy K.
   • Prinzen F.W.
   Cardiac resynchronization therapy: refocus on the electrical substrate.
   Circ J Off J Jpn Circ Soc. 2011; 75: 1297-1304
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Glikson M.
   • Nielsen J.C.
   • Kronborg M.B.
   • et al.
   ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).
   Eur Heart J. 2021; 2021https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Kusumoto F.M.
   • Schoenfeld M.H.
   • Barrett C.
   • et al.
   2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the Evaluation and Management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart rhythm Society.
   Circulation. 2019; 140: e382-e482
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Strik M.
   • Ploux S.
   • Huntjens P.R.
   • et al.
   Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is determined by intrinsic electrical substrate rather than by its modification.
   Int J Cardiol. 2018; 270: 143-148
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Bear L.R.
   • Huntjens P.R.
   • Walton R.D.
   • Bernus O.
   • Coronel R.
   • Dubois R.
   Cardiac electrical dyssynchrony is accurately detected by noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging.
   Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15: 1058-1069
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Rudy Y.
   Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.
   J Electrocardiol. 2006; 39: S28-S30
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Eschalier R.
   • Ploux S.
   • Lumens J.
   • et al.
   Detailed analysis of ventricular activation sequences during right ventricular apical pacing and left bundle branch block and the potential implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
   Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12: 137-143
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Ploux S.
   • Eschalier R.
   • Whinnett Z.I.
   • et al.
   Electrical dyssynchrony induced by biventricular pacing: implications for patient selection and therapy improvement.
   Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12: 782-791
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Ploux S.
    • Lumens J.
    • Whinnett Z.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive electrocardiographic mapping to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy: beyond QRS duration and left bundle branch block morphology.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 2435-2443
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Lumens J.
    • Ploux S.
    • Strik M.
    • et al.
    Comparative electromechanical and hemodynamic effects of left ventricular and biventricular pacing in dyssynchronous heart failure: electrical resynchronization versus left-right ventricular interaction.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 2395-2403
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Duchateau J.
    • Sacher F.
    • Pambrun T.
    • et al.
    Performance and limitations of noninvasive cardiac activation mapping.
    Heart Rhythm. 2019; 16: 435-442
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Johnson W.B.
    • Vatterott P.J.
    • Peterson M.A.
    • et al.
    Body surface mapping using an ECG belt to characterize electrical heterogeneity for different left ventricular pacing sites during cardiac resynchronization: Relationship with acute hemodynamic improvement.
    Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14: 385-391
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Abu-Alrub S.
    • Strik M.
    • Huntjens P.
    • et al.
    Left-axis deviation in patients with nonischemic heart failure and left bundle branch block is a purely electrical phenomenon.
    Heart Rhythm. 2021; 18: 1352-1360
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Gage R.M.
    • Curtin A.E.
    • Burns K.V.
    • Ghosh S.
    • Gillberg J.M.
    • Bank A.J.
    Changes in electrical dyssynchrony by body surface mapping predict left ventricular remodeling in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14: 392-399
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Jackson T.
    • Claridge S.
    • Behar J.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive electrocardiographic assessment of ventricular activation and remodeling response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Heart Rhythm O2. 2021; 2: 12-18
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Huntjens P.R.
    • Ploux S.
    • Strik M.
    • et al.
    Electrical substrates driving response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a combined clinical-computational evaluation.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018; 11: e005647
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Eschalier R.
    • Ploux S.
    • Pereira B.
    • et al.
    Assessment of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with wide QRS and non-specific intraventricular conduction delay: rationale and design of the multicentre randomised NICD-CRT study.
    BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e012383
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Arnold A.D.
    • Shun-Shin M.J.
    • Keene D.
    • et al.
    His resynchronization versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 3112-3122
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Arnold A.D.
    • Shun-Shin M.J.
    • Keene D.
    • et al.
    Electrocardiographic predictors of successful resynchronization of left bundle branch block by His bundle pacing.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021; 32: 428-438
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Upadhyay G.A.
    • Vijayaraman P.
    • Nayak H.M.
    • et al.
    His corrective pacing or biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization in heart failure.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74: 157-159
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Sharma P.S.
    • Dandamudi G.
    • Herweg B.
    • et al.
    Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a multicenter experience.
    Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15: 413-420
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Lustgarten D.L.
    • Crespo E.M.
    • Arkhipova-Jenkins I.
    • et al.
    His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: a crossover design comparison.
    Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12: 1548-1557
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Upadhyay G.A.
    • Cherian T.
    • Shatz D.Y.
    • et al.
    Intracardiac delineation of septal conduction in left bundle-branch block patterns.
    Circulation. 2019; 139: 1876-1888
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Zhang W.
    • Huang J.
    • Qi Y.
    • et al.
    Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.
    Heart Rhythm. 2019; 16: 1783-1790
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Huang W.
    • Su L.
    • Wu S.
    • et al.
    A novel pacing strategy with low and stable output: pacing the left bundle branch immediately beyond the conduction block.
    Can J Cardiol. 2017; 33: 1736.e1-3
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Ravi V.
    • Hanifin J.L.
    • Larsen T.
    • Huang H.D.
    • Trohman R.G.
    • Sharma P.S.
    Pros and cons of left bundle branch pacing: a single-center experience.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020; 13: e008874
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Sharma P.S.
    • Patel N.R.
    • Ravi V.
    • et al.
    Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: results from the geisinger-rush conduction system pacing registry.
    Heart Rhythm. 2021; (S1547-5271(21)02102-0)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.033
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Pujol -López M.
    • Guasch E.
    • Jim énez A.R.
    • San A.R.
    • Mont L.
    • Tolosana J.M.
    Left bundle branch pacing.
    JACC Case Rep. 2020; 2: 2225-2229
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Elliott M.K.
    • Mehta V.
    • Sidhu B.S.
    • Niederer S.
    • Rinaldi C.A.
    Electrocardiographic imaging of His bundle, left bundle branch, epicardial, and endocardial left ventricular pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Hear Case Rep. 2020; 6: 460-463
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Chan J.Y.S.
    • Huang W.J.
    • Yan B.
    Non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging of His-bundle and peri-left bundle pacing in left bundle branch block.
    EP Eur. 2019; 21: 837
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Salden F.C.W.M.
    • Luermans J.G.L.M.
    • Westra S.W.
    • et al.
    Short-term hemodynamic and electrophysiological effects of cardiac resynchronization by left ventricular septal pacing.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75: 347-359
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Laske T.G.
    • Skadsberg N.D.
    • Hill A.J.
    • Klein G.J.
    • Iaizzo P.A.
    Excitation of the intrinsic conduction system through his and interventricular septal pacing.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006; 29: 397-405
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Mills R.W.
    • Cornelussen R.N.
    • Mulligan L.J.
    • et al.
    Left ventricular septal and left ventricular apical pacing chronically maintain cardiac contractile coordination, pump function and efficiency.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2: 571-579
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Strik M.
    • van Deursen C.J.M.
    • van Middendorp L.B.
    • et al.
    Transseptal conduction as an important determinant for cardiac resynchronization therapy, as revealed by extensive electrical mapping in the dyssynchronous canine heart.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6: 682-689
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar