Programming Algorithms for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

References

1. • Wells G.
   • Parkash R.
   • Healey J.S.
   • et al.
   Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
   CMAJ. 2011; 183: 421-429
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Daubert C.
   • Behar N.
   • Martins R.P.
   • et al.
   Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide.
   Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 1463-1472
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Varma N.
   • Boehmer J.
   • Bhargava K.
   • et al.
   Evaluation, management, and outcomes of patients Poorly responsive to cardiac resynchronization device therapy.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74: 2588-2603
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Varma N.
   • Jia P.
   • Ramanathan C.
   • et al.
   RV electrical activation in heart failure during right, left, and biventricular pacing.
   JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3: 567-575
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Wilkoff B.L.
   • Cook J.R.
   • Epstein A.E.
   • et al.
   Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial.
   Jama. 2002; 288: 3115-3123
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Martin D.O.
   • Lemke B.
   • Birnie D.
   • et al.
   Investigation of a novel algorithm for synchronized left-ventricular pacing and ambulatory optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the adaptive CRT trial.
   Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9: 1807-1814
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Varma N.
   Left ventricular conduction delays in response to right ventricular apical pacing. Influence of LV dysfunction and bundle branch block.
   J Cardiovasc Electrophsyiology. 2008; 19: 114-122
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Varma N.
   Left ventricular electrical activation during right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with LBBB: visualization by electrocardiographic imaging and implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
   J Electrocardiol. 2015; 48: 53-61
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Varma N.
   When left ventricular-only pacing reverses effects of left bundle branch block.
   Europace. 2022 Jan 4; 24: 164https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab103
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Wiggers C.J.
    THE muscular reactions of the mammalian ventricles to artificial surface stimuli.
    Am J Physiol. 1925; 73: 346-378
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Jia P.
    • Ramanathan C.
    • Ghanem R.N.
    • et al.
    Electrocardiographic imaging of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: observation of variable electrophysiologic responses.
    Heart Rhythm. 2006; 3: 296-310
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Leyva F.
    • Foley P.W.
    • Chalil S.
    • et al.
    Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by late gadolinium-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011; 13: 29
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Varma N.
    • Ploux S.
    • Ritter P.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive mapping of electrical dyssynchrony in heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015; 7: 125-134
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Wisnoskey B.
    • Varma N.
    Left ventricular paced activation in CRT patients with LBBB and relationship to its electrical substrate.
    Heart Rhythm O2. 2020; 1: 85-95
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • van Everdingen W.M.
    • Zweerink A.
    • Salden O.A.E.
    • et al.
    Pressure-volume Loop analysis of multipoint pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4: 881-889
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Varma N.
    Multipolar LV leads to optimize CRT-qLV or LV paced effect?.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020; 31: 238-239
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Kobe J.
    • Dechering D.G.
    • Rath B.
    • et al.
    Prospective evaluation of electrocardiographic parameters in cardiac resynchronization therapy: detecting nonresponders by left ventricular pacing.
    Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9: 499-504
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Ueda N.
    • Noda T.
    • Nakajima I.
    • et al.
    Clinical impact of left ventricular paced conduction disturbance in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17: 1870-1877
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • van Everdingen W.M.
    • Cramer M.J.
    • Doevendans P.A.
    • et al.
    Quadripolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015; 1: 225-237
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Varma N.
    Variegated left ventricular electrical activation in response to a novel quadripolar electrode: visualization by non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging.
    J Electrocardiol. 2014; 47: 66-74
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Menardi E.
    • Ballari G.P.
    • Goletto C.
    • et al.
    Characterization of ventricular activation pattern and acute hemodynamics during multipoint left ventricular pacing.
    Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12: 1762-1769
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Varma N.
    • Baker 2nd, J.
    • Tomassoni G.
    • et al.
    Left ventricular enlargement, cardiac resynchronization therapy efficacy, and impact of MultiPoint pacing.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020; 13: e008680
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Arbelo E.
    • Tolosana J.M.
    • Trucco E.
    • et al.
    Fusion-optimized intervals (FOI): a new method to achieve the narrowest QRS for optimization of the AV and VV intervals in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25: 283-292
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Trucco E.
    • Tolosana J.
    • Arbelo E.
    • et al.
    Improvement of reverse remodeling using ECG Fusion-Optimized Intervals in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized study.
    JACC: Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4: 181-189
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Cheng A.
    • Landman S.R.
    • Stadler R.W.
    Reasons for loss of cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing: insights from 32 844 patients.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5: 884-888
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Varma N.
    • Stadler R.W.
    • Ghosh S.
    • et al.
    Influence of automatic frequent pace-timing adjustments on effective left ventricular pacing during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Europace. 2017; 19: 831-837
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Brugada J.
    • Delnoy P.P.
    • Brachmann J.
    • et al.
    Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial.
    Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 730-738
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Lunati M.
    • Magenta G.
    • Cattafi G.
    • et al.
    Clinical Relevance of systematic CRT device optimization.
    J Atr Fibrillation. 2014; 7: 1077
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Tamborero D.
    • Vidal B.
    • Tolosana J.M.
    • et al.
    Electrocardiographic versus echocardiographic optimization of the interventricular pacing delay in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011; 22: 1129-1134
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Vatasescu R.
    • Berruezo A.
    • Mont L.
    • et al.
    Midterm 'super-response' to cardiac resynchronization therapy by biventricular pacing with fusion: insights from electro-anatomical mapping.
    Europace. 2009; 11: 1675-1682
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Lecoq G.
    • Leclercq C.
    • Leray E.
    • et al.
    Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure.
    Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 1094-1100
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Gold M.R.
    • Niazi I.
    • Giudici M.
    • et al.
    A prospective comparison of AV delay programming methods for hemodynamic optimization during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18: 490-496
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Ellenbogen K.A.
    • Gold M.R.
    • Meyer T.E.
    • et al.
    Primary results from the SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison to other AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV) trial: a randomized trial comparing empirical, echocardiography-guided, and algorithmic atrioventricular delay programming in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Circulation. 2011; 122: 2660-2668
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Filippatos G.
    • Birnie D.
    • Gold M.R.
    • et al.
    Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular-only pacing.
    Eur J Heart Fail. 2017; 19: 950-957
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Yamasaki H.
    • Lustgarten D.
    • Cerkvenik J.
    • et al.
    Adaptive CRT in patients with normal AV conduction and left bundle branch block: Does QRS duration matter?.
    Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1; 240: 297-301https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.036
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Varma N.
    Therapy for cardiac resynchronization: when left ventricular–only “fusion” pacing is not enough.
    Heart Rhythm Case Rep. 2020; 6: 963-964
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Varma N.
    • O'Donnell D.
    • Bassiouny M.
    • et al.
    Programming cardiac resynchronization therapy for electrical synchrony: Reaching beyond left bundle branch block and left ventricular activation delay.
    J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7: e007489
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Ter Horst I.A.H.
    • Bogaard M.D.
    • Tuinenburg A.E.
    • et al.
    The concept of triple wavefront fusion during biventricular pacing: using the EGM to produce the best acute hemodynamic improvement in CRT.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017; 40: 873-882
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Bazoukis G.
    • Naka K.K.
    • Alsheikh-Ali A.
    • et al.
    Association of QRS narrowing with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Heart Fail Rev. 2020; 25: 745-756
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Varma N.
    • Hu Y.
    • Connolly A.T.
    • et al.
    Gain in real-world cardiac resynchronization therapy efficacy with SyncAV dynamic optimization: heart failure hospitalizations and costs.
    Heart Rhythm. 2021; 18: 1577-1585
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • O'Donnell D.
    • Wisnoskey B.
    • Badie N.
    • et al.
    Electrical synchronization achieved by multipoint pacing combined with dynamic atrioventricular delay.
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020; 61: 453-460
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Ginks M.R.
    • Shetty A.K.
    • Lambiase P.D.
    • et al.
    Benefits of endocardial and multisite pacing are dependent on the type of left ventricular electric activation pattern and presence of ischemic heart disease: insights from electroanatomic mapping.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5: 889-897
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Reddy V.Y.
    • Miller M.A.
    • Neuzil P.
    • et al.
    Cardiac resynchronization therapy with Wireless left ventricular endocardial pacing: the SELECT-LV study.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69: 2119-2129
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Morgan J.M.
    • Biffi M.
    • Geller L.
    • et al.
    ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC): a prospective and multicentre study of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 2118-2127
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Huang W.
    • Wu S.
    • Vijayaraman P.
    • et al.
    Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with Nonischemic cardiomyopathy using left bundle branch pacing.
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020; 6: 849-858
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • Brignole M.
    • Auricchio A.
    • Baron-Esquivias G.
    • et al.
    2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).
    Europace. 2013; 15: 1070-1118
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Daubert J.C.
    • Saxon L.
    • Adamson P.B.
    • et al.
    2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: implant and follow-up recommendations and management.
    Europace. 2012; 14: 1236-1286
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Gold M.R.
    • Birgersdotter-Green U.
    • Singh J.P.
    • et al.
    The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Eur Heart J. 2011; 32: 2516-2524
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Singh J.P.
    • Berger R.D.
    • Doshi R.N.
    • et al.
    Targeted left ventricular lead Implantation strategy for non-left bundle branch block patients: the ENHANCE CRT study.
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020; 6: 1171-1181
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • Derval N.
    • Duchateau J.
    • Mahida S.
    • et al.
    Distinctive left ventricular activations associated with ECG pattern in heart failure patients.
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017; 10
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar